The coming
mass departure of the baby boom generation from the global labor force
threatens the fiscal health and economies of many nations, according to
a recent report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Near-term action
is needed to shore up the fiscal health of national pension and retirement-age
health care systems in developed countries, and to prepare the baby boom
generation for the potential harsh realities to come, writes Robert Stowe
England, director of research at CSIS's Global Aging Initiative.
In "The Fiscal
Challenge of an Aging Industrial World," England examines official government
budget forecasts for elderly spending, along with a wealth of academic
and medical data, which all point to coming problems with implications
not only for the economies of individual governments, but for the world
economy.
Specifically,
England posits that the coming extreme imbalance between active workers
and retirees has the potential to slingshot the economies of countries
around the world into staggering deficits, resulting in a bleak outlook
for governmental and economic fiscal soundness.
Drastically
increasing retirement benefit and healthcare spending for the elderly is
a worldwide phenomenon, and there are lessons that can be drawn from current
efforts in other countries to deal with the problem, he told United Press
International.
"Looking at
all of the experiences can teach a lesson on the danger of delay and the
difficulty of the challenge, as well as some in the directions a country
might go," said England. "I just don't think that in the U.S., people are
aware of this problem. It has been ignored -- this global aging problem
-- and it will come to the U.S."
England writes
that the first large wave of baby boom retirees is expected to hit in 2008,
when the first-year boomers reach age 62.
The wave will
continue steadily for the next 18 years in the United States and for briefer
periods elsewhere in the world, except in Japan, where it will come at
a slightly quicker pace.
According to
the study, by 2030, the population over 65 in Japan will increase from
the current 17 percent to 30 percent; in Italy, from 18 percent to 29 percent;
in Germany, from 16 percent to 28 percent; and in the U.S. from 13 percent
to 22 percent.
Between 2010
and 2030, England anticipates an 82 percent surge in the number of elderly
people, while the working-age population grows by only 5 percent. The situation
is reportedly far more dire in Japan, where population growth projections
have plummeted and old age spending is projected to increase by enormous
levels. According to England, the Japanese government also cannot afford
to raise taxes, because past attempts to do so have plunged the country
back into recession.
This data lead
to two basic scenarios: either payroll taxes must be increased to enable
fewer people to provide funds for a greater number of retirees under the
pay-as-you-go Social Security systems in the United States and other nations;
or retirement benefits must be reduced.
In addition,
the CSIS data raises a multitude of issues when it comes to Medicare and
similar government medical benefits programs. These include the possibility
for the rationing of care--which is already occurring in subtler forms
in the U.S. through decreased payments to doctors for various procedures,
and standardized office visits--as costs continue to rise.
In his book,
England cited 2000 U.S. Social Security Administration forecasts that in
75 years payroll taxes will provide only two-thirds of the funds needed
to pay for benefits.
He also points
out that most of the countries that have so far adopted reforms have not
attempted to increase taxes to offset related spending increases, because
it has become difficult to raise taxes on workers and still keep them competitive
in the world economy. He also notes that the political risk of such a move
also played into such judgment calls.
"If you look
at the reforms, they reduce member benefits, though they are usually phased
in over a very long period of time," said England.
Sweden, which
has undertaken the most sweeping reforms of any country that has set out
to address the issue, has reduced government benefits and established supplemental
saving accounts for workers. The country has explicitly tied the benefit
level one receives to one's projected longevity after retirement, based
upon various factors.
Germany has
also reduced retirement benefits -- though on a much more moderate scale
than Sweden -- and makes up for the loss to retirees somewhat through a
supplemental system where workers can place up to four percent of their
yearly pay into a funded account.
This represents
a significant new development for the country, as it previously had no
substantial employer-sponsored pension plans, with retirees instead relying
solely on a government provided pension.
The establishment
of supplemental accounts seems to be an emerging trend across Europe, with
several countries investigating the option, or already involved creating
such accounts, said England. The proposition, however, is much more difficult
in countries like France, where opposing labor groups wield immense political
power.
Beyond the
issue of the sheer number of future retirees, is the increase in lifespan
due to medical breakthroughs that will result in increased medical costs.
Medical technology has already increased the average lifespan, with some
predictions holding that human life can be increased to 120 or even 150
years.
There is, however,
major disagreement in the medical community about the inherent aging limits
of the human body, along with the ethical implications of using even more
technology to alter those limits. Decreasing mortality rates have already
increased healthcare costs for the elderly, and have the potential to raise
those costs to as yet unseen levels.
Declining birth
rates coupled with increased longevity also raise the issue of depopulation
and a shrinking work force that will need to provide tax-based funds to
pay for the burgeoning numbers of retirees. The phenomenon is most pronounced
in Japan, Italy, Spain and Germany.
At a CSIS forum,
American Enterprise Institute senior fellow Ben Wattenberg described the
depopulation problem as having significant economic impact, including labor
shortages and production shortfalls. He predicted that by 2010 the U.S.
could have a labor shortage of as much as seven or eight percent.
At the same
forum, Sylvester Schieber, a vice president at the consulting firm Watson
Wyatt Worldwide -- who wrote the foreword to England's book -- painted
a dramatic picture of the difficult decisions ahead for the United States.
"It will be
challenging for us to let go of the dream of these retirement systems,"
said Schieber.
Though the
U.S. government should be responding to the large database of information
that shows the coming financial crisis, England said that policymakers
seem uninterested.
"The wake-up
call should have already been issued, and in some ways it has been, although
it has been ignored," he told UPI. He cited a World Bank report from 1994
that stated that current retirement-related government plans were unsustainable,
and a study from the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development
with similar findings.
England says
that although there has been some interest in the problem by Congress,
the administration, and federal agencies, it has never really peaked public
interest, which has pushing the issue to the sidelines of political
discourse. England said part of the problem is that people are either ignorant
of the issue, uninterested, or uninformed due to the lack of press coverage
of the issue.
In addition,
he said that the current Social Security Trust Fund surplus due to the
presence of baby boomers in the work force, the recent economic boom, and
the relatively low number of retirees masks the coming problems, especially
to those who are myopic about it.
"Of course,
these global macro-economic issues are fairly obtuse, and I am sure they
are not of great interest to the general public to start with, yet they
matter," he said. "The earlier this reality sets in and we deal with this,
the less draconian the solution. Imagine if we have done nothing and all
the baby boomers retire.
There will be
a battle royal over decreasing benefits with workers. It would be unavoidable."
--
Copyright 2002 by United
Press International.
All rights reserved.
--
|