Mental health
care is suffering on county, state and national levels due to lack of funding,
lack of access and a lack of trained professionals.
"It's a whole
national trend," said Rita Scardaci, director of the county's Department
of Health.
Those in the
mental health-care industry say the root of the problem stems from the
fact that mental health care is not treated with the same attention or
resources as physical health care.
"The political
system has not treated mental illness and the treatment of mentally ill
the same as physical health. Never have, still don't," said Dr. Richard
Kirk, a Sonoma-based psychiatrist and chair of the Sonoma Valley Health
Care District board. "If equity for mental health services was really put
in the system, it would be a huge change."
All too often
mental health care is considered a private insurance matter, with little
access to ongoing psychological care. However, experts say even those with
private insurance are not necessarily getting the care they need. Even
worse, those who need access to care the most are all too often the ones
with no insurance at all.
"Sonoma County
is like many other places in the nation, struggling to meet the needs of
the seriously mentally ill and just beginning the new frontier: How to
prevent mental illness, how to grow a healthy child, how to provide access
to mental health care in the absence of 'parity' laws, (which require)
insurance companies to cover mental illness on par with physical illness,"
said Art Ewart, mental health service director for the county. "In the
face of poor private insurance coverage, the community will continue to
look to an underfunded public system and be disappointed."
Up until the closure of
the inpatient unit at Santa Rosa's Psychiatric Emergency Services (known
as the Norton Center), the facility acted as a sort of "holding pen" for
all patients, regardless of what level of treatment was necessary. Although
the facility is still open to patients in crisis, a majority of outpatients
are being sent to other treatment facilities depending on what level of
care is needed.
"Public mental
health programs around the country are developing a far greater system
of care than the private insurance sector can provide," Ewart said. That
includes "everything from crisis intervention, to overnight care, to short-term
stays of 10 to 14 days in a residential setting, to traditional outpatient
case management."
Without parity
laws to provide quality mental health care at least to those with insurance,
the county is trying to get creative by launching mental health-care programs
that cover a wider variety of needs. County officials say they are in the
process of moving away from large mental hospitals in favor of smaller
treatment programs that provide patients with an appropriate treatment
for each specific situation.
"Clients treated in 'facilities'
for long periods become institutionalized," Ewart said. "The age of 'Cuckoo's
Nest' is long, long over."
In this vein,
the county developed a six-bed residential crisis intervention program,
where patients can voluntarily commit themselves to treatment in a smaller,
more home-like environment.
"That has been
huge," Scardaci said. "It's really a much more therapeutic environment."
While many county
health-care professionals see this change as a positive move for adult
patients, there is still the problem of juvenile mental health care. Children
cannot be treated in the same facilities as adults, and the newly developed
programs are mainly designed for adults. There is nowhere in Sonoma County
to take a juvenile experiencing a mental health crisis. Ewart said even
when a problem exists, the county tries everything possible to avoid hospitalizing
a minor.
"Hospitals are
not good places for children. They learn better how to threaten suicide,
how to cut themselves, how to act out, and how to hear voices," he said.
"So, we do everything possible to support to the family and keep the kid
at home before considering a hospital." When keeping a child at home is
not an option, juveniles are sent to the St. Helena Medical Center in Vallejo.
Experts say this can compound the problem, by taking the patient away from
his or her home environment.
"The farther
away you take a patient, the more it adds to the problem," Kirk said.
Even with a more progressive
mental health-care treatment plan, funding remains a concern. In May the
Department of Mental Health Services released a report to the county's
Board of Supervisors that stated plans to discontinue several mental health-care
programs, including the Adult Service Team, which is estimated to serve
at least 600 clients and the Resource Team, which aids 500 adults and 50
children. Despite slashing programs, more funding is still needed. The
report estimated the Department of Mental Health, despite cutting nearly
$7 million in programs, will still need around $2.5 million in additional
funding for the current fiscal year.
Jennifer
Hedgepeth, president of the Sonoma County chapter of the National Alliance
on Mental Illness, said her organization, along with other advocacy groups,
has felt added pressure from the loss of these programs. "There is not
enough money available to fund the services that the mentally ill depend
on," she said.
Despite the
county's attempts to develop unique treatment facilities, it is apparent
mental health care will be a problem lawmakers continue to struggle with.
First District Supervisor Valerie Brown summed it up when she said, "It's
a broken system."
--
http://www.sonomanews.com
--